|
Quality skis. That is pretty much
all you will find out there nowadays. In fact skis are
so good that you can almost stop thinking about them and
focus on what’s more important—technique.
But this is an article about skis so
let’s go there. For years manufacturers used World Cup
trickle down to dictate the construction and performance
of their skis. Most of the ski companies have, for some
time now, seen the way forward in another direction.
That is, putting more, and in some cases most, of the
company’s resources into developing killer Big Mountain,
Freeride, All Mountain, call it what you will, skis.
This is good news. For most of us the goal is just that:
to ski the whole mountain, in all conditions,
efficiently.
One of these companies whose main
focus is on skiing anywhere and everywhere is Movement
based in Vevey, Switzerland. Movement has been
constructing high standard skis since 1999 and the brand
is catching on at big mountain hotbeds such as the
Chamonix valley and Verbier.
Movement Thunder
‘Facts, sir, are nothing without
their nuance.’ --Norman Mailer testifying at the
Chicago Conspiracy Trail (1970)
The main ski in the Movement
line is the Thunder, a stiff twin tip reading
120-87-109mm over a ruler. Although designed as an all
mountain twin tip alpine ski, I have been skiing this
model for two seasons telemark style. My initial pair
had a super-low profile tip that I loved. Some would say
that a tip that low wouldn’t work well in soft snow
conditions. Personally, I feel nothing could be further
from the truth; I skied a hell of a lot of powder, crud
etc. with them and had no problems. In any case,
Movement decided last season to go to a higher profile
tip. I liked the low profile stealth design. (Keep in
mind that with any twin tip ski you can have problems
sticking the tails into the snow, in a belay scenario,
for example, or using the skis for aid in an exposed
situation. This could be a matter of consequence in
wilder areas).
|
The 23m radius designed ski
uses sandwich construction with a partial cap at
the tip and tail. It has a poplar wood core
surrounded by tri-axial fiberglass and carbon. The
running surface used is a quick Ptex 6000 and the
ski is available in three lengths: 175, 185, and
195cms. The 185 weighs 3.8kg a pair.
It started firm the day I
first tried the Thunder in the 185cm length (I
weigh between 72 and 75kgs—159 and
165lbs—depending on how much Taco Bell I’ve had
lately). We skied a quick piste and rode a lift up
heading to a classic powder run we knew. But the
approach to this run involved first skiing firm
steep moguls. My first impression dropping in was
how grippy these skis were.
Tenacious and
substantial.
And stiff.
Usually it takes me a few
runs—say two—to get the feel of a new ski. With
the Thunder I had the confidence to bounce down
those unforgiving bumps in a tight tele from the
get go. It was exhilarating and
liberating. |

|
A few weeks later I headed up Mont
Gèlè in the afternoon. Mont Gèlè has an imposingly steep
front face, and when it is firm, it’s a place where you
wouldn’t want to fall. I soloed to the main couloir on
such a day with the Thunders, started paralleling down
and had the feeling of almost perfect control. Now, I
haven’t been locked down in alpine bindings in 15 years,
but I still remember vividly the feeling of control
afforded by alpine equipment. I felt fairly close to
this kind of control for the first time in those 15
years. (Telemark will never achieve the control and
power that you can get with alpine equipment. This is
due to physics, and it is very easy to see why this is
true. But that is another story…). Farther down, I went
into some telemarks and experienced some chattering on
the rear ski, but that was more a matter of my less than
perfect technique. (One needs to absorb slightly with
the rear leg and not just brace the rear leg unmoving in
conditions like that).
Back to the first day on the
Thunders: we got to the top of our powder run and it was
nice—knee to thigh deep. I love wood-core stiffness in a
ski. I like to feel a pronounced snap, a liveliness that
says, ‘ski me hard you pansy.’ It’s like bouncing on a
well-flexed springboard and when the rhythm is right
that bounce can help propel turns in an efficient
manner. I think you can see where I am going here: the
Thunder needs to be skied actively, especially on moguls
and soft snow conditions. I won’t go so far as to say
they need to be skied aggressively (although that works
as well) but you may have trouble with these skis if
your style is passive.
I dropped in with my usual
technique, pressing through the turn and releasing
pressure in the transitions by sucking up my legs
slightly, never getting low, outside hand helping lead
with a slight skyward movement. And the Thunders diced
that face of powder with this technique, unstoppable,
like a nuclear meltdown chain reaction.
Then as the season went on, I got
more used to them.
Movement Free Heel
Misty blue and lilac too, never to
grow old… --Jimi Hendrix, ‘One Rainy Wish’
(1967)
New for 2004-05 is Movement’s
telemark-specific ski, dubbed the Free Heel (think Le
Car) The construction of the Free Heel is like the
Thunder: poplar wood core surrounded by tri-axial
fiberglass and carbon, Ptex 6000 base (with a very cool
William Tell Swiss apple, die-cut into the base) and
dimensions reading 120-81-109mms.
|
The interesting difference
with the Free Heel is that they are asymmetrical.
The concept is logical and the solution cleverly
simple: in any turn—parallel or telemark—the
inside edge (of the downhill ski) has a slightly
farther distance to travel than the outside edge
(of the uphill ski). Therefore the Free Heel is
designed with an inside edge radius of 20m, and an
outside edge radius of 19m. They are not
shifted.
The Free Heel will be
available in three lengths: 174, 183, and 189cms.
A pair of 183’s weighs 3.5kg and the tail is
designed traditional with just a slight upturn.
Lilac fades in and out on a white background
turning blue towards the tail, Swiss crosses
scattered discreetly and stylishly aft, the Swiss
apple logo complete the classy
graphics.
I received a pair of 183’s
mid-March and this time I decided to stick to
piste for a few runs that first day. The immediate
thing that you notice is the ski tips are skewed
slightly to the inside reinforcing the asymmetric
aspect of the skis. Almost as if you cut a
snowboard down the center then rounded off the
tips where the cut was made; a very cool design
feature in my thinking. |

|
Then a funny thing happened as I
started down. The skis felt as if they wanted to keep
turning. I would finish a turn and it felt as if they
wanted to keep going around and back up the hill. It was
a trippy sensation and one that I had never felt before.
By the third piste run, my technique, in a natural way,
without my thinking about it too much, adjusted to this
aspect of the ski. At this point I was able to rail the
turns—edge-lock style—leaving two perfect parallel
grooves down the piste. (This was easier to do parallel,
harder to do telemark, as is the case with any
ski).
Later in the day, I headed to
Creblet to give them a spin off-piste. Semi-firm moguls
at the top of the run were negotiated easily. Compared
with the Thunders—which I feel are about 20% stiffer—the
deeper sidecut of the Free Heel allowed more angulation,
more hip-dip if you will, than the Thunders. It was
easier to get them on edge.
Out of the large couloir and into
the lower bowl is where it got interesting, as I knew it
would. Here, I encountered heinous, heavy crud, the kind
of conditions that make or break a ski. The Free Heel
was like Electraglide in Lilac.
I went in active but without a lot
of up and down, steering with my knees, leading the Free
Heels through medium speed GS turns, gauging their
reaction, seeing how much deflection I would get through
the changeable glop. Deflection, how much the skis get
thrown around in imperfect conditions, is key (you don’t
want a lot of it), especially in places such as Verbier
or Chamonix, places where you can expect to get it all,
sometimes in one run. Like the Thunder, the Free Heel
dominated through, damp like a champ, and torsionally
solid (another key aspect) as well.
Halfway down, I knew what was up
with these skis, so I upped the speed Hot Rod
Lincoln-style (no one was to be seen in the huge bowl;
everyone else was skiing much better snow) to a
wind-splitting clip, tele-arcing with all I had. By the
time I hit the cat track I was howling like I had a
hellhound on my trail.
Disclaimer
‘Hendrix plays Delta blues for
sure – only the Delta may have been on
Mars.’ --Tony Glover, Rolling Stone
(1971)
Regard every ski test or report as
just an instrument to steer you in the right direction.
Then search out the ski and try it for yourself to see
if the ski is right for you. (For you N. Americans this
means, at least for the moment, that you will have to
visit Europe to try Movement skis. Just think of it as
another reason. If anyone is in Verbier, feel free to
email me and I’ll see what I can do to hook you up with
a pair to try).
Like a bluesman that can take an old
battered flat top and make it howl like the devil’s mojo
mistress, shades of Robert Johnson and his spiritual
grandson, Jimi, a skier with the deft touch can make any
ski sing. It ain’t the instrument but the player, and it
ain’t so much the ski as it is the skier.
And you don’t need to make a pact
with the devil to enjoy these tools. Don’t need a black
cat bone or a John the Conquer root. You just need your
credit card.

Links
Email the author at:
bobATverbier.ch
Movement Skis
Inspirations
Jimi Hendrix
Robert Johnson
Los
Straitjackets |